| Risk Warning: Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high‑risk investment and you are unlikely to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more. |
Delve into the FCA's strategic approach to regulating AI in the financial sector and understand the implications for firms.
AI - tomorrow's regulation, today?
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is taking a pragmatic approach to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the financial sector. Instead of developing a separate regulatory framework exclusively for AI, the FCA is applying and adapting existing rules and principles to manage AI-related risks. This strategy aims to ensure effective governance of AI technologies while fostering innovation in financial services.
The FCA is actively seeking to understand the current deployment strategies of AI within the firms it regulates. By learning from these firms, the FCA plans to develop strategies to ensure safe and responsible AI adoption in the financial sector.
The FCA's pragmatic approach to AI regulation
The FCA's approach to AI regulation involves interpreting and applying the government's five pro-innovation regulatory principles for AI. These principles include:
- Safety, security, robustness,
- Fairness,
- Appropriate transparency and explainability,
- Accountability and governance, and
- Contestability and redress.
To align with the FCA's interpretation of these principles, firms need to take several key steps. These steps include conducting regular audits and reviews of AI systems to identify potential security and safety risks, developing robust business continuity and incident response plans, ensuring operational resilience in the face of AI-related disruptions, and conducting thorough due diligence on AI providers.
Additionally, firms should provide regular training for staff on the security, safety, and regulatory aspects of AI and establish cross-functional teams involving legal, compliance, technical, and risk management staff to review and address AI-related issues.
The Government’s expectations
In March 2023, the UK government set out five pro-innovation regulatory principles for AI as noted above. The FCA and other regulators are expected to interpret and apply these principles within their remits. The FCA has interpreted these principles and established a preliminary framework for firms to follow. The framework integrates AI considerations into existing regulations and provides recommendations for compliance and the adoption of best practices. This framework may evolve as AI technologies and their applications grow.
Key steps for firms to ensure alignment with FCA's interpretation
To ensure alignment with the FCA's interpretation of the government's pro-innovation regulatory principles for AI, firms need to take several key steps. These steps include conducting regular audits and reviews of AI systems to identify potential security and safety risks, developing robust business continuity and incident response plans, ensuring operational resilience in the face of AI-related disruptions, conducting thorough due diligence on AI providers, providing regular training for staff on the security, safety, and regulatory aspects of AI, and establishing cross-functional teams involving legal, compliance, technical, and risk management staff to review and address AI-related issues.
By complying with these principles, firms can demonstrate their commitment to safe and responsible AI adoption in the financial sector.
Sapphire Capital Partners LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN: 565716). This article is a financial promotion and is intended for UK investors only. The content is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to invest. SEIS and EIS tax reliefs depend on individual circumstances and may change. The value of investments may go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Investment outcomes can differ substantially, potentially resulting in the loss of all your capital invested. Shares in early-stage companies are illiquid: you may be unable to sell your holding for several years, if at all. Investors should not rely on this article as a basis for investment decisions and must consider the illiquid and high-risk nature of early-stage investing. No warranty as to future outcome is implied nor should one be inferred. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change. Investments of this type are generally not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme or the Financial Ombudsman Service if the underlying companies fail.