In discussions with clients, I make it a point to stress the primary purpose of the Enterprise Investment Schemes which is to promote the growth and development of UK business and innovation. SEIS/EIS finance is "patient capital" as investors do not seek to realise a return quickly. When an investment is made, there is no expectation of imminent exit, and thus the primary reason for making the placement is not to strike a tremendous sales price; instead, it is to see whether the company can set up and start profitable trading. The SEIS/EIS rules as set out in the Income Tax Act specifically state that pre-arranged exits are not allowed. It is no wonder that business angels are big adopters of the schemes, as they provide valuable mentorship in addition to financing to companies in their development phase.
In light of the above, I do not mean that SEIS/EIS investors aren't looking for scalable companies with the potential to be "unicorns". Nor do I mean that SEIS/EIS companies are required to continue trading in perpetuity in the structure that they start in. Early stage / start-up companies that successfully establish sustainable trading usually exit from their SEIS/EIS investment, but it is not necessary that they do.
Although an exit is not the primary driver in raising SEIS/EIS investment, thinking about exit early on is needed to value the investment. Entrepreneurs must make an exit assumption on paper (even better on Microsoft Excel) as most valuation methods rely on an exit assumption, whether it is a price multiple applied to EBITDA on year five financial projections or another method (such as comparable analysis) to decide how much investment is required and the equity stake hold this represents.
SEIS/EIS shares must be held for a minimum three year holding period from the SEIS/EIS share issue date before there is a company exit and investors can fully realise the returns of their investment.
The exit strategies for SEIS / EIS companies are pretty much the standard exit strategies that you see for any type of private company, and are summarised below:
Remember the point I made earlier, that the schemes do not allow for any pre-arranged exits.
On rare occasions, some startups grow quicker than they originally anticipated, or their offering is so disruptive that they are presented with an astonishing exit opportunity before the SEIS/ EIS three year holding period expires. Entrepreneurs must be aware that if the company exits before this period, the company violates SEIS / EIS rules. Any tax reliefs already received by investors will need to be returned, and there may even be a penalty imposed on the violation of the three-year holding period.
The cost-benefit analysis of breaking the rules must be considered carefully, and I believe that management should think of themselves as having a "fiduciary duty" at least to their SEIS/EIS shareholders. After all, these investors took a gamble (a big one) when investing in the company's early stages, when financial institutions and others would not even entertain the thought. Remember that SEIS/EIS investment is #capital at risk.
The spirit of EIS is support for company growth and development. Considering an exit is not contradictory to this. However, it is not the primary driver for SEIS/ EIS investment, and should not be portrayed as a primary reason to invest. The exit channels are pretty much the same as for any private company working through the stages of the financing life cycle. However, there are a few special rules that companies with SEIS/EIS investment should keep in mind during the exit process to ensure that they act in accordance with SEIS/EIS rules.
The first round of finance is the riskiest and hardest to raise and therefore early investors are special people and should be treated with respect. Management should have a good understanding of the SEIS/EIS rules to ensure that they do not impede on the tax incentives because they are essential to the initial investors who help the company start.